Core
whoami, search_tools, execute_tool, apply_pending_action
Model Context Protocol
Point Claude, Cursor, or VS Code at your tenant host. Sign in once, grant consent, and call tools that respect the same permissions you have in the app.
Shipped on supported plans · OAuth 2.1 · tenant-scoped
Native tools appear in tools/list. The long tail lives in the catalog: search_tools then execute_tool. Module scope can be narrowed per tenant. Full tool directory →
whoami, search_tools, execute_tool, apply_pending_action
list_projects, get_project_overview, statuses, custom fields, sprints, releases
search, CRUD, comments, dependencies, bulk status, assign
list_meetings, get_meeting, search_messages
search_documents, semantic_search, catalog insights
my_work, leave balance, workspace_health, usage_report
agent-readable: list, unread count, mark read (tenant-scoped)
Sign in on your tenant host (subdomain or vanity slug). MCP is scoped to that organization.
Tenant → AI Agents shows https://{your-host}/mcp. Add it as a remote MCP server in Claude, Cursor, or VS Code.
The client opens your browser for OAuth 2.1. You pick which scopes to grant (read, and write if enabled).
Ground the session: user, tenant, plan, remaining monthly tool budget, and whether writes are enabled.
Every tool call runs with your workspace tenant_id from the verified token. Cross-tenant IDs read as not_found.
Project-scoped tools reuse the same permission templates as the REST API. If you cannot edit a task in the UI, the agent cannot either.
OAuth scope mcp:read is enough for native read tools. Writes are off until an owner enables mcp_write_enabled and you grant mcp:write.
Archive, bulk status, delete comment, and similar tools return a preview token first. apply_pending_action executes after confirmation.
Each MCP client gets an explicit consent row. Tool calls are metered and auditable from Tenant → AI Agents.
mcpAccess is an entitlement on supported plans. Caps (monthly tool calls, write rate) come from your subscription, not hardcoded in the UI.
We would rather under-promise than ship marketing fiction.
Many trackers ship an AI chat panel that summarizes the current view. Gealo MCP is different: your workspace is a typed tool registry external agents can call with OAuth, consent, and project permissions on every write.
Gealo exposes your workspace as a remote MCP server with OAuth, typed tools, and the same permissions as the REST API — not read-mostly chat layered on a tracker UI.
Read the comparison →Tasks, chat, meetings, HR, and GitHub sync live in one tenant-scoped workspace your agent can call — not a separate MCP integration stitched onto issue tracking.
Read the comparison →Linear optimizes issue flow; Gealo MCP gives external agents project permissions, notifications, dependencies, and workforce context in one registry.
Read the comparison →Notion excels at flexible docs; Gealo MCP targets software delivery — sprints, task codes, GitHub sync, and agent-callable write previews.
Read the comparison →Honest breakdowns for every major alternative: